Khalid Masood, the man responsible for the worst terrorist attack in London in over a decade, kept to himself in recent years, neighbors say. But he had a checkered past involving a series of aliases and a string of convictions for violence and possession of weapons.
Police kept his identity quiet at first as they sought to track down his associates and search related properties.
But a fuller picture is now emerging of the 52-year-old who, on Wednesday, drove an SUV onto a sidewalk on Westminster Bridge, killing four people and injured dozens more before being shot dead by a firearms officer just inside the grounds of the Houses of Parliament.
The early years
Born in Britain on December 25, 1964, in Kent, south-east England. His birth name was Adrian Russell Ajao, although he went on to use multiple aliases.
As a boy, Adrian Ajao — as he was then known — was a popular pupil who “liked to party” and was a keen soccer player, former high school classmate Stuart Knight, told Britain’s Press Association news agency.
The pair attended Huntleys Secondary School for Boys in the well-heeled town of Tunbridge Wells, Kent, for five years, Knight said. They left the school — which has since closed — in 1981. An undated school photo shows Ajao, smiling and with his arms folded, with members of a soccer team.
“He was a very nice guy, down-to-earth, liked by everyone around him,” he told PA. “There was nothing unassuming about him, he was a very good sportsman, his mother was a Christian, he was an all-round nice guy.”
Criminal convictions
It’s not clear how Masood developed from being a well-liked, athletic schoolboy to a man with a string of criminal convictions.
But according to police, his first conviction — for criminal damage — was in November 1983, when he would have been 19. This was followed by convictions for assaults including causing grievous bodily harm, possession of offensive weapons and public order offenses.
His most recent conviction was in December 2003 for possession of a knife, police said.
However, he had not been accused of any terrorism offenses.
Police first identified him as Khalid Masood, but said he had also gone by the name Adrian Elms.
A report published in November 2000 in the East Sussex newspaper The Argus said Adrian Elms, then 35, was given a two-year prison term for slashing the face of a cafe owner in an argument in a pub.
According to the report, Elms, from the village of Northiam, near Rye, admitted charges of unlawful wounding and criminal damage at Hove Crown Court. He was one of only two black men living in the village at the time and there were “racial overtones” to the row, the court heard.
“His wife and family have now become ostracised in the village. It is a very small community and his wife and family have been extremely affected by this, his lawyer, Alexander Taylor-Camara, told the court.
“He will effectively have to move his family from the village and start to live his life all over again. It will leave the village with a view of black people in the area. The trust that may have been there in the beginning is now completely lost.”
Birmingham connections
After leaving prison, Masood appears to have moved around over the years. His most recent connections are with Birmingham, in central England.
Police searched two properties where Masood and his family are thought most recently to have lived, in the Winson Green and Hagley Road areas of Birmingham. Eight of the 11 arrests made as of Friday afternoon in connection with the investigation were in Birmingham.
Police were seen Friday carrying boxes from a modern, redbrick town house in a quiet cul-de-sac in Winson Green. Masood is believed to have lived there until December.
Marjoli Gajecka, 26, told CNN she had seen Masood and his family often when she visited her mother, who lives on the same street. Masood was calm and kept to himself, she said, adding: “He was never really talkative with neighbors.”
She said Masood had two children, a boy and a girl, whose ages she estimated at six or seven.
She was “very shocked” by the news he had carried out the attack, she said. “They just seemed a normal family, a normal Muslim family. We never suspect anything. It’s just a shock.”
Masood wore “Islamic clothes” most of the time, Gajecka said. A woman she presumed to be Masood’s wife wore a veil with just her face uncovered. She also saw the young girl wearing a headscarf.
Masood and his family would not have stood out in this multicultural, diverse neighborhood. People are close here, popping in and out of each other’s homes. Some voiced shock over how the atrocity in Westminster had been brought to their doorstep.
About two miles south, on busy Hagley Road, is the apartment above a shop where Masood and his family are thought to have moved at the end of the year.
Several arrests were made at the property after police raided it Thursday.
Raviyar Sedighi, who owns the shop below the flat, told CNN he recognized Masood and that “he was a normal customer, normal man.”
He knew him as a “bodybuilding man,” Sedighi said, going to the gym and buying energy drinks. Sometimes Masood wore a cap, at other times he wasn’t dressed in Islamic dress, he said.
Radicalization
The wide-ranging police inquiry into Masood’s connections is focused on how he became radicalized.
Asked about his possible conversion to Islam and subsequent radicalization, Britain’s top counterterror officer, Mark Rowley said: “Clearly that’s the main line of our investigation, is what led him to be radicalized, was it through influences in a community, influences from overseas, or through online propaganda.”
Prime Minister Theresa May said the attacker was known to authorities for links to “violent extremism.”
He was investigated “some years ago” by security services, but was regarded as a “peripheral figure,” May told the House of Commons. He was not part of the “current intelligence picture,” and authorities did not know he was about to mount an assault.
A UK official told CNN that Masood’s age was not typical for an ideologically-driven attacker: “52 is interesting. Not the usual young pup profile.”
The ISIS-linked Amaq news agency asserted the attack was carried out by one of its “soldiers.” But that does not necessarily mean the group had any direct connections to Masood, whom it did not name.