Recently, Robert Kennedy Jr. was in Sacramento, California, to campaign against Senate Bill 227, which makes it harder for parents to opt out of vaccinations. In his remarks at an anti-vaccination movie screening, he decided to compare “vaccine-induced” autism to the Holocaust. He said, “They get the shot, that night they have a fever of a hundred and three, they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is gone,” Kennedy said. “This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country.”
A few days later, he apologized to people who were outraged on behalf of the memory of the Holocaust. To many, it’s sacrilege to compare any lesser issue to the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis.
In a statement, Kennedy said, “I want to apologize to all whom I offended by my use of the word to describe the autism epidemic. I employed the term during an impromptu speech as I struggled to find an expression to convey the catastrophic tragedy of autism, which has now destroyed the lives of over 20 million children and shattered their families.”
Robert Kennedy Jr. has apologized for the wrong things.
First and foremost, vaccines do not cause autism. The two have nothing to do with each other.
Second, he seems to think people with autism are “gone,” their lives “destroyed” and their families “shattered.” Autism is not a death sentence. People with autism are not missing or destroyed. They are everywhere, trying to live their lives in a society that too often demeans them as subhuman, missing or worthless.
Kennedy’s rhetoric is a problem, even beyond the fraudulent basis for his claims about vaccines. People who believe autism is an environmental disease try to cure kids with quack treatments like giving them bleach-based enemas. Others, believing autism functions as a death sentence, even kill their children.
I am worried about the effect of having such a powerful, high-profile member of our political class endorse this demeaning depiction of life with autism.
I reached out to a number of autistic activists for comment. Ari Ne’eman, president of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network, wrote, “Robert Kennedy Jr, who has engaged with autism only to spread lies, misinformation and dehumanizing rhetoric, has never meaningfully engaged in efforts to improve the lives of autistic Americans. While his father, uncle and many others in the Kennedy-Shriver family championed the rights of people with disabilities, he has instead cast his lot with those who use pseudo-science to question our humanity.”
These are harsh words, but try to see the situation through Ne’eman’s eyes. Not only is Kennedy perpetuating a discredited theory, but he’s also suggesting that it’s better to let your children get preventable and sometimes fatal diseases than risk becoming autistic.
The usual response to people like Ne’eman is that he is “high functioning,” but what of the burden to families who are struggling to care for less able individuals?
Henry Frost, an autistic teenager and writer, is devastated by this focus on burden. Last year, he wrote a post to other autistic children: “Know you are not a burden or trouble for being. You are a person who has every right to be. A family that is saying love but saying you are so hard so wrong for not being as they wanted. The family is wrong. Not You.”
Meanwhile, Amy Sequenzia, an autistic activist and blogger, wrote, “I am very disabled, have most of the usual not autism but co-occurring conditions, seizures almost every day, but am happy, proud and accomplished, with the human supports I have. That’s what is missing. Acceptance.” As children, Sequenzia and Frost might well have been just the kinds of people labeled as “gone,” by Kennedy. Clearly, both are very much present.
The solution lies in understanding autism and related conditions as part of human diversity. Michael S. Monje Jr., an autistic writer and editor with Autonomous Press, wrote, “The neurodiversity movement is a direct counter to this kind of attitude. It is a way for autistic people, as well as anyone else who experiences the world differently due to their neurology, to assert that these natural divergences in human development are just that — natural. The fact that they are largely unsupported by our society as it is currently configured does not make them in any way less natural, less worthy, or less beautiful than other ways of being in the world.”
I wish Kennedy realized how much his apology demeaned people with intellectual disabilities, even as he defended the sacred status of the Holocaust.
There is, though, one story from the Holocaust that he might do well to consider. The first group the Nazis systematically exterminated, in the infamous Action T4, were people with intellectual and other kinds of disabilities. Thousands of children, adolescents and adults were sent to gas chambers, laying the groundwork for the later, larger scale acts of genocide. Underlying Action T4 was the belief that people with disabilities were devoid of value.
We fight those beliefs by celebrating neurodiversity, not by fearmongering.
Kennedy owes a lot of people another apology.
Read CNNOpinion’s new Flipboard magazine.