NATO hasn’t solved its spending problem

President Trump has changed his tune on NATO. Not so long ago he was slamming members of the alliance for not paying their way, then in February he said money was “pouring in” thanks to his intervention.

It’s true that NATO members are spending more. But the trend started well before Trump was elected, and it will be many years before some members are in a position to hit the group’s official spending target.

Trump, who has declared NATO “no longer obsolete,” will meet with leaders from other member nations on Thursday in Brussels.

Only five of the group’s 28 members — the U.S., Greece, Poland, Estonia and the U.K. — currently meet the official target of spending 2% of GDP on defense.

The group is slowly making progress, however. In 2014, members pledged to increase their outlays, and collective spending increased the following year for the first time in two decades.

Last year, 22 members spent more as a share of national economic output.

“The defense spending pledge was made in 2014. That’s when some countries started to increase spending,” said Claudia Major, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. “Trump became president in 2017. The timeline is clear.”

The spending increases are designed to be gradual to protect the economies of members states.

“We have to remember what we actually promised. We didn’t promise to spend 2% tomorrow. What we promised was to stop the cuts, gradually increase and then move towards 2%,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said last week.

Stoltenberg said Thursday that NATO would ask member countries to develop national spending plans and report on their progress each year.

“This will be a new tool, to ensure we keep up the momentum and live up to our commitments,” he said.

Many economies in Europe are still suffering from budget cuts imposed as part of austerity programs. Unemployment remains high and while growth is recovering, it remains relatively weak.

“To reach the goal by 2024, some countries, for example Spain, would have to increase their spending by 15% every year. That’s not feasible,” Major said.

Greece, one of the handful of countries of countries that meets the spending target, has been criticized for years by its creditors for spending too much on overpriced military contracts.

Major suggested NATO countries should focus on efficiency. “Europeans need to spend more, but they also need to spend well. The 2% target doesn’t measure the results.”

NATO is based on the principle of collective defense: an attack against one or more members is considered an attack against all.

But there is no penalty for countries that don’t meet the spending target.

Germany spent 1.19% of its GDP on defense last year, France forked out 1.78%. Canada, Slovenia, Belgium, Spain and Luxembourg all spend less than 1%.

Fear of Russian aggression is driving some of the recent spending splurge. Latvia, which shares a border with Russia, increased its defense budget by 42% in 2016. Its neighbor Lithuania boosted its outlays by 34%.

Exit mobile version