Obama to UN: ‘We all face a choice’ of cooperation or division

President Barack Obama bids farewell to the United Nations Tuesday with an address meant to recap eight years of efforts to foster peace and security around the globe, despite an often-tumultuous world that stymied his efforts.

He touted his foreign policy achievements even as he acknowledged the deep concerns about an integrated world witnessed at home and abroad.

Listing the global financial recovery, the Iran nuclear deal and openings in Cuba and Myanmar, Obama insisted the world continue to work together to solve persistent problems.

“This is important work. It has made a real difference in the lives of our people. And it could not have happened had we not worked together,” he said.

“We are seeing the same forces of global integration … also expose deep fault lines in the existing international order,” Obama said. “We see it in the headlines every day.”

His speech is a final opportunity to harness the commanding optics of the stately General Assembly hall to bolster his message 49 days before votes are cast for his replacement, in a race as much a referendum on Obama’s record as a choice for his successor.

Obama’s address also comes amid fresh reminders of the destabilizing threats he’ll leave behind when he departs office in January. Diplomats gathering in New York this week have contended with terror threats at close range, with a blast injuring dozens in Manhattan as the UN convened nearby, as well as a stabbing plot at a mall in Minnesota and a pipe bomb in New Jersey.

Obama offered global leaders a stark choice Tuesday, saying they could advance toward cooperative action or retreat into isolationist tendencies.
“Our societies are filled with uncertainty and unease and strife,” Obama said during his final address to the United Nations General Assembly. “Despite enormous progress as people lose trust in institutions, governing becomes more difficult and tensions between nations become more quick to surface.”
“I believe that at this moment we all face a choice,” Obama said. “We can choose to press forward with a better model of cooperation and integration or we can retreat into a world sharply divided and ultimately in conflict along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion. I want to suggest to you today that we must go forward and not back.”
Obama said voices pressing for globalization had too often ignored trends toward inequality, leading to politics toward “aggressive nationalism” and a “crude populism … often from the hard right.”
“We cannot dismiss these visions. They are powerful,” Obama said. “I do not believe those visions can deliver security or prosperity over the long term.”

Despite Obama touting his achievement, the array of places where Obama’s approach hasn’t yielded the outcomes he projected during his first appearance here in 2009 were also unavoidable. Those include closing the Guantanamo Bay naval prison, fully withdrawing US troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and negotiating peace between Israel and the Palestinians — the last a major topic in his first four UN addresses that was entirely absent during last year’s speech.

Obama does plan to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday to “discuss the need for genuine advancement of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the face of deeply troubling trends on the ground,” according to White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest.

Other persisting crises — the emergence of ISIS, a bloody civil war in Syria and Russia’s continued incursion into Ukraine — hadn’t yet erupted when Obama entered office but have strained his efforts to foster global stability.

Those intractable problems are largely the focus of Obama’s bilateral agenda in New York this week, including during talks with Iraq’s Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi Monday to plot a campaign to retake ISIS-held Mosul. He also conferred with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang about North Korea’s most recent nuclear test.

“On the one hand, there are enormous positive indicators in our world today in terms of economic growth, standards of living, the ability to forge international cooperation on very difficult issues like climate change,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, said last week. “At the same time, there’s also a great deal of unease.”

Obama was well-received when he arrived at the UN in 2009 and vowed to shift US tactics toward collective action rather than the more unilateral approach of President George W. Bush. Obama himself acknowledged that he arrived with outsized expectations rooted “in a discontent with a status quo that has allowed us to be increasingly defined by our differences, and outpaced by our problems.”

In the ensuing seven years, Obama maintained his insistence upon pursing diplomatic resolutions to sticky global disputes, best evidenced in the controversial agreement to loosen sanctions on Iran in exchange for the country reducing its nuclear program.

“We made good on the President’s pledge to engage with those with whom we disagree, opening up new, profound opportunities for diplomatic progress,” said Samantha Power, Obama’s ambassador to the UN since 2013. “I think it’s hard to overstate the transformative effect that this approach has had.”

For all of those achievements, global unease remains — some of it connected to American political developments. UN delegates are witnessing the caustic final stretch of the US presidential campaign, which has left foreign allies unsure of their standing come January. Obama has used his UN addresses in the past to confront domestic anxieties, including during his reelection battle with Mitt Romney in 2012 and later when racial tensions prompted protests in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014.

Last year, as isolationist vows and bombastic rhetoric were fueling Donald Trump’s rise, Obama warned against turning inward.

“The increasing skepticism of our international order can be found in the most advanced democracies. We see greater polarization, more frequent gridlock, movements on the far right, and sometimes the left, that insist on stopping the trade that binds our fates to other nations, calling for the building of walls to keep out immigrants,” he said a year ago. “The United States is not immune from this.”

In the ensuing 12 months, those forces have strengthened, evidenced not only by Trump’s clinching of the Republican nomination but also a vote in the United Kingdom to exit the European Union and a resurgence of nationalist parties across Europe.

Still, even as both Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton also stopped by New York this week to meet with world leaders attending the General Assembly, Obama hopes to achieve a last push for greater cooperation between nations even after he leaves office.

“I think the way the President will approach this is trying to apply what we have done that’s worked in the last eight years as a template for how we deal with other crises,” Rhodes said ahead of Obama’s speech. “The question is, ‘What are the approaches that we’re taking to deal with different challenges?’ And that’s what he’ll lay out in the speech.”

Exit mobile version