LT Supers to Penalize Violators of Amended Sewer Ordinance

CLEARFIELD – At Tuesday night’s meeting, the Lawrence Township Board of Supervisors finalized stringent penalties against property owners who fail to comply with the amended sewer ordinance and who contribute to its excessive storm water inflow and infiltration into the sewer system.

In recent months, the supervisors have been exploring options to reduce the storm water entering their sanitary sewer lines by putting the hammer down on property owners who have downspouts, sump pumps and French drains joined with the sewer system.

According to a previous GantDaily.com report, last month, Supervisor Ed Brown suggested the penalty fine start at $1,000 and to allow violators 60 days to correct the problem.

If not corrected at the conclusion of the next 60-day period, he suggested fining the violator another $2,000.

If the problem still exists after another 60-day period, he suggested that the township enter the property and correct the problem at the cost of the property owner.

The supervisors unanimously approved Brown’s recommendation by a 3-0 vote at last month’s meeting. The amended ordinance passed by a 2-0 vote Tuesday with Supervisor William Lawhead being absent from the meeting.

At the August meeting, Supervisor Chairman Glenn Johnston explained the township could face millions in fines, as well as a consent order that wouldn’t allow the township any leeway on addressing the storm water problem. Additionally, he said it could be dealt a moratorium on all building permits within the township until the problem is addressed.

Johnston said that Monday morning, the township will be meeting with the DEP, Clearfield Borough and the Clearfield Municipal Authority to discuss storm water infiltration problems.

“I’m hoping that our pre-empted movement in that area will get them to look kindly upon us,” Johnston said. “There are a lot of bad possibilities that could come out of that. They have been known to be very ruthless.”

Johnston said there will be a report at the Sept. 18 supervisor’s meeting.

In other business:

“I don’t like the assumption clause in that because I can’t guarantee that. That building is old enough that it could have lead paint on it,” Brown said.

Naddeo said he didn’t think the township could accept this bid, because the assumption clause was included in the actual bid. He said it negates the bid because it is not what was asked for.

The supervisors decided to contact a previous bidder to see if they can negotiate the job for less than $25,000.

Exit mobile version